|
Community Council Boundary Changes
Every 2 years, the boundaries
of Anchorage's Community Councils are supposed to be re-evaluated. That
task has slipped by a few decades, but the recent census has spurred some
activity.
To see the current boundaries,
click on the "Maps" button at the left side of this page.
Mid-Hillside
and Hillside East Community Council Boundaries.
email dated 11/25/02
To: Community Councils Center and Community Councils
Proposed Community Council Redistricting: Update PZC takes Action
The Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) took action on Community Council
Redistricting (Case 2002-038) on November 18. The PZC made recommendations
for each boundary study area.
Available on December 9: Maps of PZC Recommendations The PZC will
adopt maps and a written description of its recommendations on Monday,
December 9, 2002 in the Assembly Chambers of the Z.J. Loussac Library
at 3600 Denali Street. The meeting begins at 6:30 p.m.
The maps and written descriptions of the PZC recommendations will be
available to the public on December 9.
Next Step: Assembly Introduction After PZC adoption, Planning
staff will prepare a new Proposed Community Council Redistricting case
packet for introduction before the Assembly. The Assembly will decide
a public review period and hearing date. Documents Available at http://www.muni.org/planning/:
· Available now in .pdf format: October 7, 14, and 29 packets containing
written public comments;
·Available after December 9: New boundary maps and written descriptions
that reflect PZC's recommendations.
If you have any questions about the project or PZC recommendations for
you boundary study area, please call 343-7916 or 343-7921.
Thank you,
Tom Davis
Physical Planning Division Planning Department
The Planning and Zoning Commision
had a hearing on the Council Boundary changes on October 7, 2002. That
hearing continued to October 14 when they will likely make a decision
on the alternatives they support.
Mid-Hillside CC president John
Weddleton gave testimony reviewing the desires expressed at the CC meeting
of September 19, 2002. See the minutes of that
meeting and Resolutions.
The boundary issues in our
area are not terribly significant. This is a big issue in some parts of
town.
At our
September 2002 meeting, we'll look at the recommendations the MOA Planning
department has come up with and vote on our preferences. The draft
report is online. The recommendations pertaining to the Mid-Hillside
and Hillside East Community Councils are posted on the council's website
and the full report will be available at our meeting. The gist of it is:
1) The area bounded
by Ruth Arcand Park, Abbott, Birch Rd and O'Malley will go to the Mid
Hillside CC with the following options:
Option A: Convey the entire area to Mid-Hillside, to adhere to
identifiable boundaries and shared elementary school areas.
Option B: Convey the area north of 104th Avenue to Mid-Hillside
CC and residences on and to the south of 104th to the Huffman/O'Malley
CC, to adhere to a compromise negotiated between two councils, and supported
by the Boundary Review Committee.
2) Far North Bicentennial
Park
Option A: We proposed
to include part of Bicentennial Park as far north as Campbell Creek.
Option B: The MOA recommends
the CC boundaries not extend into regional parks, but that the municipal
code be changed to require that adjacent CC's be consulted when an issue
arises in the park.
3) Hillside East expansion
to the south
Option A: We recommended
Hillside East boundaries to the south remain unchanged.
Option B: The MOA recommends
that the boundary be moved south to encompass the Glen Alps Community
Council Area and part of an area that is not currently in a community
council.
A task force of the Federation
of Community Councils formed in the summer of 2001 to evaluate boundaries
for Community Councils.
In November of 2001 the Federation
of Community Councils Boundary Task Force approved substantially all of
the suggestions recommended here and will include them as part of their
proposal to the Planning & Zoning Comission and then the Anchorage
Assembly.
The FCC task force's recomendations
are just part of the input on boundary changes. All citizens may speak
at the Planning and Zoning Hearing that will be held in 2002. After that,
there will likely be an opportunity to speak before the Anchorage Assembly
where the ulitmate decision will be made.
For more information on the
work of the FCC task force, click
here.
For a copy of the Final Version
of the Boundary report dated March 2002, click
here. It's a big report. The first few pages are a nice history of
Community Councils.
At our September 20, 2001 meeting
we had a presentation on the process for the boundary changes. The following
is a summary.
Community Council
Boundaries
Al Tamagni,
member of the Federation of Community Councils' Boundary Task Force presented
some options for revising the boundaries of our Community Councils.
The goals for setting
boundaries include:
- Boundaries that
are obvious so people know what council they belong to.
- Group areas that
have similar lots sizes and zoning.
- Boundaries drawn
so more than one council will include government or institutional land.
This will make sure that impacted neighborhoods are notified of events
on those lands. For example, Mid-Hillside's boundary could extend deeper
into Bicentennial Park so we are adjacent to BLM's Campbell Tract.
- Al suggested that
the boards of all the Hillside area Community Councils get together
and draw lines that work for the whole area.
- The population
covered is not an issue.
The following was sent to
the Boundary Task Force by John Weddleton on behalf of the Mid-Hillside
and Hillside-East Community Councils. October 10, 2001
The following presents possible
boundary changes for the Mid-Hillside and Hillside-East Community Councils.
The information is largely based on discussion at our regular meeting
on September 20, 2001.
The prevailing issues
up here concern our system for maintaining roads, the way we dispose
of our wastes and keeping the rural feel of the area.
Aligning our boundaries with these common interests will result in more
active participation than forcing the boundaries to match other political
boundaries.
Area bordered by Birch
Rd, Abbott Rd., O'Malley and Ruth Arcand Park.
This area is confused by
its inclusion in the Abbott Loop, the Mid-Hillside and the Huffman-O'Malley
CC's along lines that are hard to find even with a good map. Lines should
be redrawn so that residents will know which CC they belong to.
Most of this area is not
in the Anchorage Road and Drainage Service Area. Since the choice between
city utilities and wells & septic systems is a volatile issue, this
area should be part of the Huffman-O'Malley or Mid-Hillside CC rather
than the Abbott Loop CC which otherwise is completely within ARDSA.
The choice between H-OCC
and M-HCC is a toss up. In general, the lot sizes and apparent zoning
are similar to areas in both CC's.
Making this area entirely
part of the M-HCC gives the M-HCC the benefit of a border along Ruth
Arcand Park. This will encourage attention to issues within that park.
Having a border along Elmore Road will also allow the M-HCC to weigh
in on the contentious issue of the Bragaw Road Extension. I believe
residents in our area would appreciate that.
The small part of this area
that is in ARDSA points towards including this area in H-OCC since they
already deal with the conflicts between the two systems.
The current status has problems
and should be changed. I would prefer to see this area as part of the
M-HCC.
Extend boundaries farther
into Bicentennial Park.
In the interest of complete
coverage of the MOA, I recommend the northern boundaries of the M-HCC
and H-ECC extend deeper into Bicentennial Park. Campbell Airstrip Rd
and Basher Rd would make clearly identifiable northern boundaries.
Combining Mid Hillside
and Hillside East CC
This has been suggested periodically.
For most of their history, the M-HCC and H-ECC have combined meetings
for convenience. In the history of the two CC's, the idea of officially
combining them has been rejected several times.
The H-ECC contains all but
a sliver of the Upper O'Malley LRSA giving that area a strong common
interest that is not shared by the M-HCC. Many of the activities typical
of a CC are likely covered by the board of the LRSA.
Currently the H-ECC is fairly
quiet. It has not always been that way and it will probably wake up
if there is a move to combine the two CC's! It would be an error to
combine these two by looking at the short term inactivity of the H-ECC.
Combining Hillside East
and Glen Alps CC
It would be wrong to write
off the Glen Alps CC as dead. They may be quiet because there are few
issues they have to worry about. There have been issues in the past
where the GACC has risen to tackle them.
It may make sense to enlarge
the GACC so it more closely matches the Glen Alps LRSA. It is likely
that many of the issues that CC's deal with are dealt with through their
LRSA structure. Meetings of the GACC and the Glen Alps LRSA could be
combined.
This expansion would decrease
the size of the H-ECC. The northern boundary of a larger GACC would
be Huffman Rd and the west boundary would be Hillside Drive/Rabbit Creek
Road. This would make the remaining H-ECC approximate the Upper O'Malley
LRSA.
I cannot imagine any practical
change that would occur in the short term by combining two quiet CC's.
Back to Top
|